On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote: >> I suppose I'm having a hard time letting go of the attractiveness of >> "read-only == complete". However, given that you've been pretty clear >> what you think, I'm more at ease about it. :) > > Yeah, it's time to drop it. ;-) Thanks for the feedback. I've updated the PEP to resolve the open questions. Most notably, I've dropped the read-only constraint on the __definition_order__ attribute. Please let me know if you have any other outstanding concerns. Otherwise I think this PEP is ready for pronouncement. :) -eric
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4