RetroSearch Browse

Mon Jun 20 02:17:53 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/145336.html

On 06/19/2016 03:51 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:

> I think it's fine to have this SIG. I could see it going different ways
> in terms of discussions and membership, but it's definitely worth a try.
> I don't like clever names, and I very much doubt that it'll be mistaken
> for an address to report sensitive issues, so I think it should just be
> security-sig. (The sensitive-issues people are usually paranoid enough
> to check before they post; the script kiddies reporting python.org
> <http://python.org> "issues" probably will get a faster and more
> appropriate response from the security-sig.)
>
> So let's just do it.

Started the process of creating "security-sig".

--
~Ethan~

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/145336.html below:

[Python-Dev] security SIG?