Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/145287.html below:

[Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Jun 16, 2016, at 01:01 PM, David Mertz wrote:

>It seems to me that backporting 'secrets' and putting it on Warehouse would
>be a lot more productive than complaining about 3.5.2 reverting to (almost)
>the behavior of 2.3-3.4.

Very wise suggestion indeed.  We have all kinds of stdlib modules backported
and released as third party packages.  Why not secrets too?  If such were on
PyPI, I'd happily package it up for the Debian ecosystem.  Problem solved
<wink>.

But I'm *really* going to try to disengage from this discussion until Nick's
PEP is posted.

Cheers,
-Barry

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4