RetroSearch Browse

Thu Jun 16 03:26:14 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/145243.html

On 16 Jun 2016 6:55 PM, "Larry Hastings" <larry at hastings.org> wrote:
>
>

> Why do you call it only "semi-fixed"?  As far as I understand it, the
semantics of os.urandom() in 3.5.2rc1 are indistinguishable from reading
from /dev/urandom directly, except it may not need to use a file handle.

Which is a contract change. Someone testing in E.g. a chroot could have a
different device on /dev/urandom, and now they will need to intercept
syscalls for the same effect. Personally I think this is fine, but assuming
i see Barry's point correctly, it is indeed but the same as it was.

-rob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160616/d4baebb4/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/145243.html below:

[Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?