RetroSearch Browse

Sat Jun 11 17:35:23 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/145112.html

[Guido]
> ...
> An alternative would be to keep the secrets module linked to SystemRandom,
> and improve the latter. Its link with os.random() is AFAIK undocumented. Its
> API is clumsy but for code that needs some form of secret-ish bytes and
> requires platform and Python version independence it might be better than
> anything else. Then the secrets module is just what we recommend new users
> on Python 3.6.

There's an issue currently open about this:

    http://bugs.python.org/issue27288

The docs for SystemRandom are very brief, so people may have actually
noticed ;-) the first sentence:

    Class that uses the os.urandom() function for generating random numbers ...

IOW, "uses os.urandom()" has been one of its only advertised qualities.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/145112.html below:

[Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?