RetroSearch Browse

Sat Jun 11 16:48:48 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/145107.html

> On Jun 11, 2016, at 4:26 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> 
> Only issue I can think of that we're missing is one to track reverting os.urandom() to 3.4 semantics (any doc updates required for the random module?). Am I missing anything?

It’s already been reverted to 3.4 semantics (well, it will try to use getrandom(GRD_NONBLOCK) but falls back to /dev/urandom if that would have blocked).

—
Donald Stufft

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160611/74278d32/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/145107.html below:

[Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?