RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jun 10 15:16:30 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/145048.html

[David Mertz]
> OK.  My understanding is that Guido ruled out introducing an os.getrandom()
> API in 3.5.2.  But would you be happy if that interface is added to 3.6?
>
> It feels to me like the correct spelling in 3.6 should probably be
> secrets.getrandom() or something related to that.

secrets.token_bytes() is already the way to spell "get a string of
messed-up bytes", and that's the dead obvious (according to me) place
to add the potentially blocking implementation.  Indeed, everything in
the `secrets` module should block when the OS thinks that's needed.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/145048.html below:

[Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?