Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/144961.html below:

[Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:39:00PM -0400, Donald Stufft wrote:

> There are three options for what do with os.urandom by default:
> 
> * Allow it to silently return data that may or may not be 
> cryptographically secure based on what the state of the urandom pool 
> initialization looks like.

Just to be clear, this is only an option on Linux, right? All the other 
major platforms block, whatever we decide to do on Linux. Including 
Windows?


-- 
Steve

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4