RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jun 7 15:45:35 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/144876.html

We should definitely keep supporting MSVC.

--Guido (mobile)
On Jun 7, 2016 12:39 PM, "Sturla Molden" <sturla.molden at gmail.com> wrote:

> Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is it worth to support a compiler that in 2016 doesn't support the C
> > standard released in 1999, 17 years ago?
>
> MSVC only supports C99 when its needed for C++11 or some MS extension to C.
>
> Is it worth supporting MSVC? If not, we have Intel C, Clang and Cygwin GCC
> are the viable options we have on Windows (and perhaps Embarcadero, but I
> haven't used C++ builder for a very long time). Even MinGW does not fully
> support C99, because it depends on Microsoft's CRT. If we think MSVC and
> MinGW are worth supporting, we cannot just use C99 indiscriminantly.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160607/0584fe5d/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/144876.html below:

[Python-Dev] C99