RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jun 7 13:56:37 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/144861.html

Setting it to None in the subclass is the intended pattern. But CPython
must explicitly handle that somewhere so I don't know how general it is
supported. Try defining a list subclass with __len__ set to None and see
what happens. Then try the same with MutableSequence.

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote:

> For binary methods, such as __add__, either do not implement or return
> NotImplemented if the other operand/class is not supported.
>
> For non-binary methods, simply do not define.
>
> Except for subclasses when the super-class defines __hash__ and the
> subclass is not hashable -- then set __hash__ to None.
>
> Question:
>
> Are there any other methods that should be set to None to tell the
> run-time that the method is not supported?  Or is this a general mechanism
> for subclasses to declare any method is unsupported?
>
> --
> ~Ethan~
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160607/026aa47f/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/144861.html below:

[Python-Dev] Proper way to specify that a method is not defined for a type