I'll ask my colleague what his compiler setup was. On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > 2016-06-04 19:47 GMT+02:00 Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>: > > Funny. Just two weeks ago I was helping someone who discovered a > > compiler that doesn't support the new relaxed variable declaration > > rules. I think it was on Windows. Maybe this move is a little too > > aggressively deprecating older Windows compilers? > > I understood that Python only has a tiny list of officially supported > compilers. For example, MinGW is somehow explicitly not supported and > I see this as a deliberate choice. > > I'm quite sure that all supported compilers support C99. > > Is it worth to support a compiler that in 2016 doesn't support the C > standard released in 1999, 17 years ago? > > Victor > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160607/9df99a4a/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4