You should get in touch with Mark Shannon, while you're working on ceval. He has some definite improvements that can be made to the eval loop. -eric On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote: > Following the converting 8-bit bytecode to 16-bit bytecode (wordcode), there > are other issues for improving the bytecode. > > 1. http://bugs.python.org/issue27129 > Make the bytecode more 16-bit oriented. > > 2. http://bugs.python.org/issue27140 > Add new opcode BUILD_CONST_KEY_MAP for building a dict with constant keys. > This optimize the common case and especially helpful for two following > issues (creating and calling functions). > > 3. http://bugs.python.org/issue27095 > Simplify MAKE_FUNCTION/MAKE_CLOSURE. Instead packing three numbers in oparg > the new MAKE_FUNCTION takes built tuples and dicts from the stack. > MAKE_FUNCTION and MAKE_CLOSURE are merged in the single opcode. > > 4. http://bugs.python.org/issue27213 > Rework CALL_FUNCTION* opcodes. Replace four existing opcodes with three > simpler and more efficient opcodes. > > 5. http://bugs.python.org/issue27127 > Rework the for loop implementation. > > 6. http://bugs.python.org/issue17611 > Move unwinding of stack for "pseudo exceptions" from interpreter to > compiler. > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ericsnowcurrently%40gmail.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4