RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jul 12 21:57:59 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-July/145596.html

On 12 July 2016 at 20:05, INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> "PEP 520 -- Preserving Class Attribute Definition Order"
>> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0520/
>> => accepted -- what is the status of its implementation?
>> I also see some discussions for even more compact dict implementation.
>
> Here is implementation of the compact dict preserving insertion order.
> http://bugs.python.org/issue27350
>
> I hope it is reviewed before merging PEP 520 implementation.

Several of my review comments on the draft 520 implementation were
aimed at ensuring the assumption of the use of ODict specifically were
minimised, so the test, docs and implementation tweaks needed to
adjust back to an insertion-ordered-by-default plain dict will be
pretty minimal, even if the current 520 implementation lands first
(which seems likely).

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-July/145596.html below:

[Python-Dev] Status of Python 3.6 PEPs?