On 6/07/2016 9:51 AM, Steve Dower wrote: > On 05Jul2016 1615, Peter wrote: >> It's not the URL it is complaining of, rather >> On Windows, Norton Internet Security virus checks all downloads. One of >> the names they give to the result of their scanning is 'File Insight'. >> From what I can tell, it uses a few checks: >> - virus scanning using known signatures >> - observable malicious behaviour >> - how well known or used it is across other users of Nortons. >> It seems that the last of these is a causing the warning. >> Obviously this is not a problem for me, but may be concerning for less >> tech savvy Windows users that get the warning. >> There isn't a way within Nortons to 'report for clearance' of the file. >> And my chat with a (entry level) Norton representative got nowhere. >> I'll email screen captures in the next email. Let me know if they don't >> come through and I'll paste them somewhere. >> Let me know if I can give any more information. > > I don't think there's anything we can do about this, other than > convince more users of Norton Internet Security to use Python 2.7 > (apparently Python 3.5 is more popular with that demographic :) ) > > The installer is signed with the PSF's certificate, which keeps > Windows Smartscreen happy and is the only way we can indicate that > it's trustworthy. If Norton requires different criteria then that is > on them and not something we can fix. > > Cheers, > Steve I suspect you're right. It's a flawed model that they're using, and they are quite impervious to suggestions. Glad 3.5 is winning :-) Keep up the good work. Peter
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4