On 22 January 2016 at 07:27, Emile van Sebille <emile at fenx.com> wrote: > On 1/21/2016 10:42 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >> >> On 21 January 2016 at 17:18, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: >>> >>> It's live: https://docs.python.org/devguide/#status-of-python-branches >> >> Nice :-) >> >> Minor nit, the status column says "end of life", but the text below >> the table uses the term "end of line" (as does the comment "Versions >> older than 2.6 reached their end-of-line". From my experience, "end of >> life" is the more common term. > > I'd prefer end-of-support -- bet you can't count how many pre 2.5 > installations are still live. I can count the number of folks contributing changes to the upstream Python 2.5 branch: zero. Even if somebody offered a patch for it, we wouldn't accept it - that maintenance branch is dead, which is what the "End of Life" refers to. Folks are still free to run it (all past Python releases remain online, all the way back to 1.1), and downstreams may still offer support for it, but that's their call. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4