On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 23:07 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 21 January 2016 at 10:16, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > > I just checked with Van and we should have CLAs for even PEP > contributors, > > so it will have to go through the same steps as the other ancillary > > repositories. > > We should probably mention that in PEP 1 Yep. > - I wasn't aware of that > requirement, so I've never explicitly checked CLA status for folks > contributing packaging related PEPs. (And looking at the > just-checked-in PEP 513, I apparently have a CLA to chase up...) > Yeah, I didn't know either until I asked Van, so I think it's new to everyone. :) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160121/7d4ce71e/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4