On 2016-01-20 2:09 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: >> > > You don't free a version tag that's stored in the guard. You store the > object and not id Ah, got it. Although for my current cache design it would be more memory efficient to use the dict itself to store its own unique id and tag, hence my "ma_extra" proposal. In any case, the current "ma_version" proposal is flawed :( Yury
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4