On 2016-01-20 2:02 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com> wrote: > [..] >>> Brett, you need two things - the ID of the dict and the version tag. >>> What we do in pypy is we have a small object (called, surprisingly, >>> VersionTag()) and we use the ID of that. That way you can change the >>> version id of an existing dict and have only one field. >> Yeah, that's essentially what I propose with ma_extra. >> >> Yury > The trick is we use only one field :-) > > you're proposing to have both fields - version tag and dict id. Why > not just use the id of the object (without any fields)? What if your old dict is GCed, its "VersionTag()" (1) object is freed, and you have a new dict, for which a new "VersionTag()" (2) object happens to be allocated at the same address as (1)? Yury
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4