On 1/20/2016 12:45 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 at 19:33 Martin Panter <vadmium+py at gmail.com > <mailto:vadmium%2Bpy at gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 19 January 2016 at 20:12, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org > <mailto:brett at python.org>> wrote: > > Here is a proposed update: > > > > diff -r 633f51d10a67 pep-0007.txt > > --- a/pep-0007.txt Mon Jan 18 10:52:57 2016 -0800 > > +++ b/pep-0007.txt Tue Jan 19 12:11:44 2016 -0800 > > @@ -75,9 +75,9 @@ > > } > > > > * Code structure: one space between keywords like ``if``, > ``for`` and > > - the following left paren; no spaces inside the paren; braces > may be > > - omitted where C permits but when present, they should be formatted > > - as shown:: > > + the following left paren; no spaces inside the paren; braces are > > + strongly preferred but may be omitted where C permits, and they > > + should be formatted as shown:: > > > > if (mro != NULL) { > > ... > > This change seems to be accidentally smuggled in, in the guise of a > PEP 512 update :) > > > Darn, sorry about that; forgot I had that change sitting in my peps > checkout. I'll revert it when I get home (unless the change is actually > acceptable to Guido). I thought that the above was your intentional compromise change given the range of opinions ;-). -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4