A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-February/143388.html below:

[Python-Dev] Buffer overflow bug in GNU C's getaddrinfo()

[Python-Dev] Buffer overflow bug in GNU C's getaddrinfo() [Python-Dev] Buffer overflow bug in GNU C's getaddrinfo()Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Wed Feb 17 16:21:27 EST 2016
Does python.org serve any Python binaries that are statically linked
with a vulnerable glibc? That seems to be the question. If not, it's
up to the downstream distributions.

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Andrew Barnert via Python-Dev
<python-dev at python.org> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2016, at 10:44, MRAB <python at mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
>>
>> Is this something that we need to worry about?
>>
>> Extremely severe bug leaves dizzying number of software and devices vulnerable
>> http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/02/extremely-severe-bug-leaves-dizzying-number-of-apps-and-devices-vulnerable/
>
> Is there a workaround that Python and/or Python apps should be doing, or is this just a matter of everyone on glibc 2.9+ needs to update their glibc?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org



-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4