A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-February/143307.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 515: Underscores in Numeric Literals

[Python-Dev] PEP 515: Underscores in Numeric Literals [Python-Dev] PEP 515: Underscores in Numeric LiteralsSerhiy Storchaka storchaka at gmail.com
Thu Feb 11 13:29:15 EST 2016
On 11.02.16 19:40, Georg Brandl wrote:
> On 02/11/2016 06:19 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>
>>> Thanks for the alternate patch.  I used the two-function approach you took
>>> in ast.c for my latest revision.
>>>
>>> I still think that some cases (like two of the examples in the PEP,
>>> 0b_1111_0000 and 1.5_j) are worth having, and therefore a more relaxed
>>> rule is preferable.
>>
>> Should I write an alternative PEP for strong rule?
>
> That seems excessive for a minor point.  Let's collect feedback for
> a few days, and we can also collect some informal votes.

I suspect that my arguments can be lost otherwise.

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4