On 9 February 2016 at 01:57, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal <chris.barker at noaa.gov> wrote:OTOH, it's a > All I can say is "ouch". Hard to call it a regression to no longer > allow this mess.. OTOH, it's a major regression for someone using an 8-bit codepage that doesn't have these problems. Code that worked fine for them now doesn't. I dislike "works for some people" solutions as much as anyone, but breaking code that does the job that people need it to is not something we should do lightly (if at all). Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4