Hi, On 02/01/2016 10:43 PM, Yury Selivanov wrote: > > We also need to deoptimize the code to avoid having too many cache > misses/pointless cache updates. I found that, for instance, LOAD_ATTR > is either super stable (hits 100% of times), or really unstable, so 20 > misses is, again, seems to be alright. > Aren't those hits/misses a way to see how dynamic the code is? I mean can't the current magic (manually tweaked on a limited set) values, be self tweaked/adapted on those numbers? Thanks in advance, francis
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4