RetroSearch Browse

Wed Dec 21 11:39:08 EST 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-December/147052.html

2016-12-21 17:21 GMT+01:00 Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com>:
> It sounds like the opt-out approach isn't working very well, and maybe an
> opt-in approach should be considered instead? I recognize that the way C
> headers work makes this difficult, but it seems like something needs to
> change.

I proposed something different:
"Python 3.7: remove all private C functions from the Python C API?"
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-September/146386.html

Create subdirectories in Include/ to define private functions in
different files.

Victor

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-December/147052.html below:

[Python-Dev] Issue #23903 - stable API is incomplete