On 2016-12-16, 23:59 GMT, Guido van Rossum wrote: > No need to get all bent out of shape. My proposal is to simply > add a note to the docs recommending against using this. > I wouldn't change any code, not even a silent deprecation > warning. (Also, read the rest of the thread to learn why this > is not the best practice for writing Python 2/3 straddling > code.) Oh, that sounds a way better. Thank you. Matěj -- https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mcepl at ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8 If Patrick Henry thought that taxation without representation was bad, he should see how bad it is with representation.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4