Many eons ago, Jim created abstract.h. The proposal comment (which you're right to be cutting out now) was his and at some point it was accepted, but I just copied-pasted the whole text into abstract.h. So yes, please keep the "many thanks to Jim Fulton" in there! On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-12-16 11:24 GMT+01:00 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>: > > Since you are cleaning up, you could remove the whole "PROPOSAL: A > > Generic Python Object Interface for Python C Modules" introduction, > > which isn't very interesting to read today. > > Ah right, I noticed this huge comment but I didn't understand the > purpose. IMHO https://docs.python.org/dev/c-api/ is now a much better > documentation for the Python C API. I agree to remove the long > introduction. > > By the way, I'm surprised by the "many thanks to Jim Fulton" in the > comment, since I'm not sure to what it is referred to. But in case of > doubt, I prefer to keep it :-) > > /* Abstract Object Interface (many thanks to Jim Fulton) */ > > Victor > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ > guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20161216/fe8a3f4c/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4