On Dec 10, 2016 10:42 AM, "Wes Turner" <wes.turner at gmail.com> wrote: and this is on purpose, since Python is BSD software which > anyone can use, modify, fork, etc. > So, otherwise everyone who forks for any reason is in violation of the trademark policy? The trademark issue has nothing to do with the code copyright or forking. PyPy, Brython, IronPython, Jython are all distinct code bases that implement (mostly) the same language semantics. Probably all of those use some code from CPython, but even if some other implementation used zero common code it wouldn't matter. None of those projects are allowed to call their next release "Python 2.8" either, regardless of precise semantics implemented. I could call some project Foothon 2.8 if I wanted, because it wouldn't invite confusion about official status for the PDF. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20161210/0d7e4456/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4