Le 30 août 2016 8:05 PM, "Nick Coghlan" <ncoghlan at gmail.com> a écrit : > This seems to be the crux of the disagreement: our perceptions of the > relative risks to native Windows Python applications that currently > work properly on Python 3.5 vs the potential compatibility benefits to > primarily *nix applications that currently *don't* work on Windows > under Python 3.5. As I already wrote once, my problem is also tjat I simply have no idea how much Python 3 code uses bytes filename. For example, does it concern more than 25% of py3 modules on PyPi, or less than 5%? Having an idea of the ratio would help to move the discussion forward. Victor -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160830/60331ee2/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4