On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 at 11:56 Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote: > On 30.08.16 21:20, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:12:01 +0000 > > Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > >>> Why not make it always a list? List objects are reasonably cheap in > >>> memory and access time... (unlike dicts) > >> > >> Because I would prefer to avoid any form of unnecessary performance > >> overhead for the common case. > > > > But the performance overhead of iterating over a 1-element list > > is small enough (it's just an array access after a pointer dereference) > > that it may not be larger than the overhead of the multiple tests and > > conditional branches your example shows. > > Iterating over a tuple is even faster. It needs one pointer dereference > less. > I'll talk it over with Dino and see what he thinks. > > And for memory efficiency we can use just a raw array of pointers. > I would rather not do that as that leads to having to track the end of the array, special memory cleanup, etc. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160830/252c4a66/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4