A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-August/145935.html below:

[Python-Dev] Update on PEP 523 and adding a co_extra field to code objects

[Python-Dev] Update on PEP 523 and adding a co_extra field to code objects [Python-Dev] Update on PEP 523 and adding a co_extra field to code objectsChristian Heimes christian at python.org
Mon Aug 29 18:28:10 EDT 2016
On 2016-08-29 23:38, Brett Cannon wrote:
> That means we still want to find a solution to attach arbitrary data to
> code objects without sacrificing performance. One proposal is what's in
> PEP 523 for the extra field. Another option is to make the memory
> allocator for code objects pluggable and introduce a new flag that
> signals that the object was created using a non-default allocator.
> Obviously we prefer the former solution due to its simplicity. :)

May I remind you that you can have the field with no extra memory cost?
:) The struct has sub-par alignments.

Christian
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4