A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-August/145902.html below:

[Python-Dev] Review request: issue 27350, compact ordered dict

[Python-Dev] Review request: issue 27350, compact ordered dictINADA Naoki songofacandy at gmail.com
Sat Aug 27 22:59:41 EDT 2016
Last call.  There are only two weeks until 3.6 beta.
Please review it if possible.

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:12 PM, INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, devs.
>
> I've implemented compact and ordered dictionary [1], which PyPy
> implemented in 2015 [2].
>
> Since it is my first large patch, I would like to have enough time for
> review cycle by Python 3.6 beta1.
>
> Could someone review it?
>
> [1] http://bugs.python.org/issue27350
> [2] https://morepypy.blogspot.jp/2015/01/faster-more-memory-efficient-and-more.html
>
> --
> INADA Naoki  <songofacandy at gmail.com>

-- 
INADA Naoki  <songofacandy at gmail.com>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4