A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-August/145826.html below:

[Python-Dev] Review request: issue 27350, compact ordered dict

[Python-Dev] Review request: issue 27350, compact ordered dictMaciej Fijalkowski fijall at gmail.com
Mon Aug 15 02:32:00 EDT 2016
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Xavier Combelle
<xavier.combelle at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/08/2016 17:06, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> * there are nice speedups
>>
> in this blog post
> https://morepypy.blogspot.fr/2015/01/faster-more-memory-efficient-and-more.html
> it is mentioned big speedup only on microbenchmark and small speedups on
> pypy benchmark. is it what you call nice speedups or does there is other
> things ?

Yes, making dictionaries faster by a bit would not give you huge
speedups everywhere. It'll give you a small, measurable speedup a bit
everywhere. This is much better than a lot of things that cpython does
which is a performance win.

Note that there are two PEPs (sorted order in kwargs and sorted order
in class names) which would be superseded by just reviewing this patch
and merging it.

Best regards,
Maciej Fijalkowski
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4