On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Martin Panter <vadmium+py at gmail.com> wrote: > If replace() actually supported these keywords all along, then I am happy > with this proposal. > With the obvious exception of "fold", it did at least since Python 3.0 (and likely since 2.x where x is 5 ± 1.) > There are a few bug reports that may be relevant: > > https://bugs.python.org/issue13386: notation where there is no simple > default value > https://bugs.python.org/issue23738: notation for defaults for > positional-only parameters Thanks. These are helpful, but they don't address the case in hand where the member function defaults are taken from the other attributes.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4