RetroSearch Browse

Thu Apr 21 17:55:48 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-April/144312.html

...is that a typo for 2.7.11?

On 4/21/2016 17:44, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
> I was running Python 2.4.11 under strace and I noticed some odd
> looking system calls:
>
> mmap(NULL, 262144, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7f9848681000
> munmap(0x7f9848681000, 262144)          = 0
> mmap(NULL, 262144, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7f9848681000
> munmap(0x7f9848681000, 262144)          = 0
> [... repeated a number of times ...]
>
> Looking at obmalloc.c, there doesn't seem to be any high/low
> watermark (hysteresis) associated with unallocating arenas.  Is that
> true?  If so, does it seem prudent to implement something to avoid
> this behavior?  It seems potentially expensive if you program is
> running just at the threshold of needing another arena.
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/tritium-list%40sdamon.com

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-April/144312.html below:

[Python-Dev] obmalloc mmap/munmap thrashing