On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: > > 2016-04-20 18:12 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon <brett at python.org>: >> >> I thought Chris and I w/ Ethan helping with coding, but if it's just me for >> the PEP then that's fine; Well, just in case you didn't notice this on python-ideas, I offered to work on the PEP in case there turns out to be one. This was when Guido had asked if there is going to be a PEP, in response to my "Type hinting for path-related functions" email. That offer is certainly still valid. >> luckily my firefighter gear is well-worn: >> https://goo.gl/photos/R8oWdLE45d99ebaw8 > > LOL, it seems appropriate for this topic... It sure has been flammable XD >> I'll try to get a PEP draft written and posted prior to PyCon US. I will >> reply to any dangling comments/issues that have appeared overnight to close >> those threads, but otherwise I will start ignoring all discussions so I can >> focus on the PEP. Everyone can now consider themselves spared from any >> further path-related discussions. :) Yes, going from endless discussion to PEP seems like a very healthy direction at this point. > I hesitated to propose to create a fspath-sig mailing list, but I suck > at humor and so I skipped this joke in my email ;-) You did not have to tell that joke, the joke was present all the time ;). > Victor > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/k7hoven%40gmail.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4