A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-April/144288.html below:

[Python-Dev] Bytes path

[Python-Dev] Bytes path [Python-Dev] Bytes pathPhilip Jenvey pjenvey at underboss.org
Wed Apr 20 03:54:59 EDT 2016
Yes, in the 3.2 time frame there was a consensus that only bytes and their subclasses should be accepted. buffer support crept back into the posix module with the major changes in 3.3, likely by mistake. A couple new issues are proposed to remove these inconsistencies/regressions:

http://bugs.python.org/issue26754 <http://bugs.python.org/issue26754>
http://bugs.python.org/issue26800 <http://bugs.python.org/issue26800>

--
Philip Jenvey

> On Apr 14, 2016, at 3:29 AM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> IMHO it's more a side effect of the implementation than a deliberate choice. For new code which really want to support bytes paths, I suggest to only accept bytes and bytes subclasses.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160420/98c4e3dd/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4