On 04/17/2016 02:05 PM, Koos Zevenhoven wrote: > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: >> On 04/17/2016 06:58 AM, Koos Zevenhoven wrote: >> >>> So, as a summary: With a str+bytes-polymorphic __fspath__, with the >>> above argumentation and the rough implementation of os.fspath(...), >>> the conclusion is that the os.fspath function should indeed be public, >>> and that no further variations are needed. >> >> >> Nice summation, thank you. :) >> > > Come on, Ethan, that summary was not for you ;) Heh. > You can do better than that: read the whole thing! ;-). Ah, but I did read the whole thing! I just didn't want to quote it all and then add one line, so I snipped the rest. Let me try again: Good, well thought-out post. Thank you. :) if-at-first-you-don't-succeed'ly yrs, -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4