RetroSearch Browse

Fri Apr 15 05:21:55 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-April/144196.html

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:26:31AM +0200, Victor Stinner wrote:
> It's easy to implement this function (in the native language of your Python
> implemenation), it's short. I'm not sure that a Python version is really
> safe.
> 
> The secrets module is for Python 3.6, in this version the hmac already
> "requires" the compare_digest() function no?

The current version looks like this:

try:
   from hmac import compare_digest
except ImportError:
   # fallback version defined

but I'm having second thoughts about this. I don't think it needs to 
support older versions of Python, but perhaps it needs to support 
implementations which don't include compare_digest?

This isn't just a question about the secrets module. PEP 399 suggests 
than any C classes/functions should have a pure Python version as 
fallback, but compare_digest doesn't. I don't know whether it should or 
not.

https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0399/

-- 
Steve

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-April/144196.html below:

[Python-Dev] Should secrets include a fallback for hmac.compare_digest?