Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-April/144187.html below:

[Python-Dev] Pathlib enhancements - acceptable inputs and outputs for __fspath__ and os.fspath()

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Pathlib enhancements - acceptable inputs and outputs for __fspath__ and os.fspath()
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Pathlib enhancements - acceptable inputs and outputs for __fspath__ and os.fspath()
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 04/14/2016 06:01 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 04/14/2016 05:20 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

>> you'll have to impose it on me.
>
> Hmm.  Well, the good news is you have convinced me that letting bytes
> through willy-nilly is akin to loosing the hounds of hell on our code.
> The bad news is I was never in that camp.  ;)

Actually, in retrospect, I was in that camp at the beginning.  But 
Brett's code (and your arguments, amongst others) convinced me of that 
<one function with a flag> or <a pair of functions> would be better/safer.

--
~Ethan~

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Pathlib enhancements - acceptable inputs and outputs for __fspath__ and os.fspath()
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Pathlib enhancements - acceptable inputs and outputs for __fspath__ and os.fspath()
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4