A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-April/144177.html below:

[Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 509: Add a private version to dict

[Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 509: Add a private version to dict [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 509: Add a private version to dictBarry Warsaw barry at python.org
Thu Apr 14 17:29:26 EDT 2016
On Apr 14, 2016, at 11:17 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:

>You're right that incrementing the global version is useless for these
>specific cases, and using the version 0 should work. It only matters
>that the version (version? version tag?) is different.
>
>I will play with that. If I don't see any issue, I will update the PEP.
>
>It's more an implementation detail, but it may help to mention it in the PEP.

I can see why you might want a global version number, but not doing so would
eliminate an implicit reliance on the GIL, or in a GIL-less implementation
<wink> a lock around incrementing the global version number.

-Barry
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4