RetroSearch Browse

Thu Apr 14 17:19:24 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-April/144176.html

2016-04-14 22:50 GMT+02:00 Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org>:
> Although I'm not totally convinced, I won't continue to object.  You've
> provided some performance numbers in the PEP even without FAT, and you aren't
> exposing the API to Python, so it's not a burden being imposed on other
> implementations.

Cool!

Ah right, the PEP evolved since its first version sent to
python-ideas. I didn't recall the full context of the discussion. The
PEP is now more complete and it has more known (future) use cases ;-)
(now maybe also Cython?)

Victor

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-April/144176.html below:

[Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 509: Add a private version to dict