On 12.04.2016 18:04, Chris Barker wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Sven R. Kunze <srkunze at mail.de > <mailto:srkunze at mail.de>> wrote: > > > My conclusion is that these changes are not optional and tweaking > os, io and shutil is just yet another workaround for a clean > solution. :) > > > Is the clean solution to re-implement EVERYTHING in the stdlib that > involves a path in a new, fancy pathlib way? > > If we were starting from scratch, I _might_ like that idea, but we're > not starting from scratch. And that would cement in pathlib itself, > leaving no room for other path implementations. kind of like how the > pre-__Index__ python cemented in python integers as the only objects > once could use to index a sequence. I cannot remember us using another datetime library. So, I don't value this "advantage" as much as you do. Best, Sven -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160412/a4fb704c/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4