RetroSearch Browse

Mon Apr 11 17:40:29 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-April/143941.html

On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 13:40 Sven R. Kunze <srkunze at mail.de> wrote:

> On 10.04.2016 16:51, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On 10 April 2016 at 15:07, Sven R. Kunze <srkunze at mail.de> wrote:
> >> If there's some agreement to change things with respect to those 5
> points, I
> >> am willing to put some time into it.
> > In broad terms I agree with these points. Thanks for doing the
> > research. It would certainly be good to try to improve pathlib based
> > on this sort of feedback while it is still provisional.
>
> I'd appreciate some guidance on this. Just let me know what I can do
> since I don't know the processes of hacking CPython.
>

https://docs.python.org/devguide/ and
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-mentorship are your friends.
:)

For new features of a module you can discuss it on python-ideas first
before proposing a patch if you're worried a patch implementing the feature
might get rejected and you don't want to risk wasting your time.

-Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160411/56891f3a/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-April/143941.html below:

[Python-Dev] pathlib+os/shutil feedback