On 04/11/2016 01:33 PM, Alexander Walters wrote: > In reviewing the ongoing arguments about how to make pathlib better, > there have been circular arguments about if it is even broken, if it > should support bytes, if there should be a path protocol that all > functions that touch the filesystem should use, if that protocol should > support bytes, how that protocol should be open or closed to allow third > party modules to act as paths, etc., etc. Do not take lots of discussion as a negative. It's better to thrash it out thoroughly first. > If there is headway being made, I do not see it. It's being made, and I dare say we are close to the end. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4