On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:51:23 +1200, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > > On 9 April 2016 at 23:02, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote: > > > >>That is, a 'filename' is the identifier we've assigned to this thing > >>pointed to by an inode in linux, but an os path is a text representation > >>of the path from the root filename to a specified filename. That is, > >>the path *is* the name, so to say "path name" sounds redundant and > >>confusing to me. > > The term "pathname" is what is conventionally used to refer > to a textual string passed to the OS to identify an object > in the file system. > > It's often abbreviated to just "path", but that's ambiguous > for our purposes, because "path" can also refer to one of > our higher-level objects. I find it interesting that in all my years of unix computing I've never run into this (at least so that I became concious of it). I see now that in fact the Posix spec uses 'pathname'. Objection, such as it was, completely withdrawn :) (Nick's point about Path object vs path is also a good one.) --David
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4