RetroSearch Browse

Wed Apr 6 17:03:55 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-April/143723.html

On 04/06/2016 01:47 PM, Sven R. Kunze wrote:

> I still cannot remember what the concrete issue was why we dropped
> pathlib the same day we gave it a try. It was something really stupid
> and although I hoped to reduce the size of the code, it was less
> readable. But it was not the path->str issue but something more mundane.
> It was something that forced us to use os[.path] as Path didn't provide
> something equivalent. Cannot remember.....

I'm willing to guess that if you had been able to just call

   os.whatever(your_path_obj)

it would have been at most a minor annoyance.

--
~Ethan~

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-April/143723.html below:

[Python-Dev] When should pathlib stop being provisional?