On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Roberto MartÃnez > <robertomartinezp at gmail.com> wrote: >> I am having a hard time trying to choose one of this two products: >> >> Phyton 27: >> http://www.amazon.com/Phyton-27-Systemic-Bactericide-Fungicide/dp/B00VKPL8FU >> Phyton 35: >> http://www.amazon.com/Phyton-Bactericide-fungicide-Substitute-Liter/dp/B00BGE65VM >> >> Phyton 35 is announced as the "Substitute for Phyton 27" but I feel that >> Phyton 27 is more tested and have a bigger user base. >> >> Can you help to choose? > > Sure! This is a fairly common question, and it comes down to what sort > of plants you're trying to use this with. Some plants prefer Phyton > 27, while others prefer Phyton 35. Most plants are happy with either, > though, so unless you have a good reason to do otherwise, use Phyton > 35. > > Phyton 35 has some significant improvements that make it far better at > handling plants from different parts of the world. And even some > American plants have special black markings on them, or cost so much > money that they're priced in Euros, or for some similar reason need > the advanced care of Phyton 35. As such, I strongly recommend that you > develop a taste for Phyton 35, as it will serve you better in the long > run. In this era of international foods in every supermarket aisle, > you cannot simply dismiss the black marks as "funny spots" and wish > they'd just go away; you MUST have a fungicide which can adequately > handle them. > Also keep in mind that Phyton 35 improve on previous fungicide by allowing asynchronous plant growing using eukaryotic microorganisms also known `yeast from`. -- M
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4