On 2015-09-28 19:00, Erik Bray wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal > <chris.barker at noaa.gov> wrote: >> >> You can use "Windows SDK for Windows 7 and .NET Framework 4". >> >> http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=8279 >> >> >> Thanks. Last time I tried that route, it was for 64 bit py2.7. And it >> required some kludging of environment variables, and registry acces I don't >> have permission for. >> >> But it still may be the best bet. I'll give it a try when I have a chance. >> >> And this should be in the "official" docs... > > For what it's worth, I've had good luck compiling *most* extension > modules on Windows using the gcc from MinGW-w64. > > The big notable exception was that last time I tried compiling Numpy > with it I got a segfaulting Numpy. But I never had a chance to > investigate why or if it's fixable. My own extension modules work > fine on Windows when compiled in MinGW though. > > Erik B. > Same here. I compile the regex module for Python 2.5-2.7 and 3.1-3.5, both 32-bit and 64-bit, using MinGW-w64, and I haven't had a problem yet that wasn't due to a bug in the source code. > >> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal >> <chris.barker at noaa.gov> wrote: >>> >>> As I understand it, the MS VS2010 compiler is required (or at least >>> best practice) for compiling Python extensions for the python.org >>> Windows builds of py 3.4 and ?[1] >>> >>> However, MS now makes it very hard (impossible?) to download VS2010 >>> Express ( or Community, or whatever the free as in beer version is >>> called). >>> >>> I realize that this is not python-dev's responsibility, but if there >>> is any way to either document where it can be found, or put a bit of >>> pressure on MS to make it available, as they have for VS2008 and >>> py2.7, that would be great. >>> >>> Sorry to bug this list, I didn't know where else to reach out to. >>> >>> -Chris >>> >>> [1] it's actually prefer hard to find out which compiler version is >>> used for which python version. And has been for years. Would a patch >>> to the docs, probably here: >>> >>> https://docs.python.org/3.4/using/windows.html#compiling-python-on-windows >>> >>> Be considered? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Python-Dev mailing list >>> Python-Dev at python.org >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >>> Unsubscribe: >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/songofacandy%40gmail.com >> >> >> >> >> -- >> INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-Dev mailing list >> Python-Dev at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >> Unsubscribe: >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/erik.m.bray%40gmail.com >> > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python%40mrabarnett.plus.com > >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4