On 09/24/2015 04:47 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 24 Sep 2015 01:21, "Tim Peters" <tim.peters at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Guido's reply gave a clearer invariant: >> >> dt.timestamp() == >> dt.astimezone(utc).timestamp() == >> dt.astimezone(<any other tz>).timestamp() >> > Might it be worth mentioning Guido's invariant in the section of the PEP > about the timestamp method? > Or maybe worth adding it as unittest? Regards, francis
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4