On 24 Sep 2015 01:21, "Tim Peters" <tim.peters at gmail.com> wrote: > > Guido's reply gave a clearer invariant: > > dt.timestamp() == > dt.astimezone(utc).timestamp() == > dt.astimezone(<any other tz>).timestamp() > > That's the key point. If the timestamps are equivalent, then it > follows that conversions to UTC are equivalent (UTC calendar notation > is just another way to spell a POSIX timestamp), and so also that > conversions back from UTC are equivalent. Thanks for the additional clarifications all, I'm confident I understand now :) Might it be worth mentioning Guido's invariant in the section of the PEP about the timestamp method? Cheers, Nick. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150924/77f592db/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4